Intel Core i5-13500 Latest Review

The Core i5-13500 is Intel's new $250 offering, packing fourteen cores in total, twenty threads, and 35. five MB cache. this can be a motivating virtually hybrid-like computer hardware because it packs the larger L3 cache capability of the raptorial bird Lake i5' whereas mistreatment the smaller L2 cache of Alder Lake, therefore it's not just a barred version of the spectacular 13600K, so we're terribly keen to ascertain however it performs.

The 13500 is a thrilling processor. compared to the 13600K you get a similar vi P-Cores with Hyper-Threading support for twelve threads, however wherever the 13600K cores clock as high as 5.1 GHz, the 13500 is capped to 4. eight GHz. the extensive amendment is to the P-cores, wherever the L2 cache has been downgraded from a pair of MB to 1.25 MB, this is that the equal functionality as Alder Lake CPUs, while the K-SKUraptorial bird Lake components all received a 2 MB upgrade which will facilitate boost performance.



The 13500 will retain all eight E-cores, for the identical core count because of the 13600K and doubly that of the 12600K. this can be an enormous deal as the 12th-gen latched Core i5' reminiscent of the 12500 didn't feature any E-cores at all, therefore we're going from zero to eight in a single generation. However, just like the P-cores, the E-cores are receiving the 12th-gen cache capability, so in contrast to the 13600K E-cores that pack a four MB cache capacity per cluster, the 13500 has been downgraded to a pair of MB per cluster.

Despite these changes, the L3 cache capacity remains twenty-four MB, identical because the 13600K and four MB are over what you get with the 12600K and half dozen MB more than the 12500.


At $250 the Core i5-13500 may well be well positioned as the best-worth all-rounder for budget-orientating builds and its main competition here would be the Ryzen five 7600.

13500 will retain all eight E-cores, for the identical core count because of the 13600K and doubly that of the 12600K. this can be a giant deal as the 12th-gen fastened Core i5' similar to the 12500 didn't feature any E-cores at all, thus we're going from zero to eight during a single generation. However, just like the P-cores, the E-cores are receiving the 12th-gen cache capability, so in contrast to the 13600K E-cores that pack a four MB cache capacity per cluster, the 13500 has been downgraded to a pair of MB per cluster.

Despite these changes, the L3 cache capacity remains twenty-four MB, identical because the 13600K and four MB are over what you get with the 12600K and six MB more than the 12500.


At $250 the Core i5-13500 may be well positioned as the best-worth all-rounder for budget-directed builds and its main competition here would be the Ryzen five 7600.




Those aren't huge performance dips however it's valuable to note that the core temperature ran at 92c with a C.P.U. package power of 100c, the associate degree this can be whereas throttling.


therefore as was common we tend to ditch the terrible box cooler for the testing, and instead used the be quiet! Pure Loop two FX 360mm AIO. With the liquid cooler, the i5-13500 maintained a P-core frequency of 4.5 rates and an E-core frequency of 3.5 GHz, so when an hour of load we saw no dip within the clock speeds, and that' as a result of the 13500 ran at simply 62c, that is well below the thermal threshold.


Application Benchmarks


beginning with Cinebench R23 multi-core results we tend to see that the Core i5-13500 is incredibly spectacular for core-heavy productivity workloads which will utilize the E-cores well.


in comparison to the Ryzen 7600, we're observing a 44% increase in performance, a colossal gain that sees the barred Core i5 even outpacing the 7700X. it absolutely was conjointly simply 12% slower than the 13600K which distinction during this check is only right down to clock speed as cache plays a really tiny role here.


the only core performance is similar to the Ryzen 7600 and slightly lower than the 12600K for the easy proven fact that the 12th-gen half clocks slightly higher. Still, in comparison to the 13600K, we're talking about a couple of tiny 6% reductions in performance.


The 7-Zip compression results are heavily influenced by heart performance. The Core i5-13500 victimization and best DDR4 configuration are mere ~10% faster than the 5600X and 16% slower than the 7600. However, once armed with DDR5 memory the 13500 is 14% faster than the 7600, although it did still path the 13600K by a 14% margin. Still, overall superb performance for the price.


DRAM performance has virtually no influence on decompression performance, therefore here the 13500 will well victim either DDR4 or DDR5 memory, delivering comparable performance to the 5800X, creating it up to 10% faster than the seven600.


The liquidizer Open knowledge results are terribly impressive, here the E-cores are operating well and as a result, we're observing Ryzen 7 7700-like performance, making the 13500 a minimum of 28% faster than the 7600 and simply 12% slower than the 13600K.


It's an identical story within the Corona benchmark, here the Core i5-13500 is 13% slower than the 13600K, however, 37% faster than the 7600, and performance was a lot of similar victimization either DDR4 or DDR5 memory.




Next up we've Premiere professional 2022, ANd here we tend to see once mistreatment DDR4 memory that the 13500 is slower than the Ryzen 5800X, furthermore because the 7600, trailing by a 9% margin.


however, when paired with DDR5 memory the secured Core i5 enjoys an enormous 21% performance bump, permitting it to beat the 7600 by an 11% margin to return barely 4% slower than the 13600K.


We're also seeing solid performance gains when upgrading from DDR4 to DDR5 in Photoshop, with DDR5 providing an extra 17% performance. all the same, the E-cores are nearly useless in this gentle rib application, which means the Ryzen 7600 remains slightly quicker here.


In Adobe once Effects the Core i5-13500 managed to beat the Ryzen 7600, even when mistreatment DDR4 memory, tho' performance was nearly identical. Armed with DDR5 though the 13500 was 9% faster than the 7600 and simply a % slower than the 13600K.


The last productivity benchmark we've is code compilation and here the Core i5-13500 once more performed terribly well, trailing the 13600K by a mere 3% margin or 9% when using DDR4 memory. Either configuration saw it beat the 7600 and it had been 17# ster when mistreatment DDR5.


play Benchmarks


Time for a few gaming benchmarks and we tend to begin with Factorio. Here the Core i5-13500 performed abundant identically using either DDR4 or DDR5 memory and once using DDR5 it had been simply 3% slower than the Ryzen 7600 and just 5% slower than the i5-13600K. Overall a good result for the secured Core i5 part.


We're reaching out to concentrate on the ten80p information however we'll show you the 1440p average data furthermore for the 10 games we tested.


In Watch Dogs Legion, we see that the i5-13500 performed far better using DDR5 memory, delivering nearly 20% bigger performance. once restricted to DDR4 we're gazing at similar performance to the Ryzen 5800X, however, with DDR5 the 13500 was able to match the 7600, creating it 9% slower than the 13600K.


The Rainbow Six Extraction results are terribly attention-grabbing as here the 13500 seems to struggle quite a bit, tho' the results create sense. The E-cores are in fact useless here, therefore when it involves play performance the Core i5-13500 goes to be almost like the 12600K, it's 's clocked slightly lower, but it packs a 20% additional L3 cache.


We see that once armed with identical DDR5 memory that the 13500 is 5% faster than the 12600K, however 14% slower than the 13600K, and an enormous 23% slower than the 7600. The Zen four processors perform fine during this title, tho' to be truthful the 1% lows for the 13600K and 7600 are comparable.


The gunman three performance, whereas excellent overall, maybe a bit lackluster compared to the Ryzen 7600, which matched the 13600K, a minimum of for the common frame rate. Again, DDR5 provided the most effective results, boosting the average frame rate by 13% to 205 fps, identical performance delivered by the 5800X3D, ANd this saw the 13500 trailing the 7600 by an 8% margin.



The Core i5-13500 managed a hundred and ten independent agencies in Spider-Man Remastered once exploiting DDR5 and ninety-nine fps with DDR4 creating the DDR5 configuration 11% stern.


That additionally meant that the 13500 was simply 4% slower than the 7600 and 7% slower than the 13600K that it beat the 12600K by a 7% margin, so overall solid performance and right wherever we'd expect this half to land.


Here we're gazing at a rather substantial 20% performance uplift for the Core i5-13500 using DDR5 against DDR4, pumping out 228 fps to create it 5% slower than the Ryzen 7600 and 10% slower than the 13600K. therefore once more wherever we'd expect it to be the specs, are around 7% faster than the 12600K.


Like Rainbow Six Extraction, Horizon Zero Dawn heavily favors Zen four CPUs, and during this instance quite heavily. DDR5 memory also doesn't facilitate the 13500 here and though it absolutely was simply 8% slower than the 13600K, that created it an enormous 26% slower than the 7600.


the advantages of DDR5 memory are apparent in Cyberpunk 2077 where the Core i5-13500 is up to 22% faster due to the extra bandwidth. all the same with 181 independent agencies on average that meant it absolutely was slightly slower than the Ryzen 7600, simply a 4% margin during this example.


command advantages additional from L3 cache performance than it will DRAM performance, however, all the same DDR5 is providing a gentle 5% jump for the 13500, which saw it are available 10% slower than the 13600K and 7% slower than the 7600.


within the Riftbreaker the 13500 outperforms the 7600, delivering 8% bigger performance once armed with DDR5 memory. That additionally created it just 5% slower than the 13600K, a good result for Intel's new secured Core i5 processor.


Last up we've Counter-Strike: world Offensive and this can be another title wherever AMD Zen four processors perform very we have a tendency toll. With 414 independent agencies on average, the i5-13500 was 11% faster than the 12600K, simply 6% slower than the 13600K, and 11% slower than the Ryzen 7600. an honest result relative to the 13600K, however a weaker than typical result compared to the thought Ryzen part.


ten Game Average


Across the games tested, the Core i5-13500 with DDR5 memory was on average 9% slower than the Ryzen 7600.


If we were to get rid of games that heavily favored the Zen four processors reminiscent of CSGO, Rainbow Six Extraction, and specifically Horizon Zero Dawn, these 2 processors would be additional equally matched. However, we have a tendency to found this sample of games usually reflects what we see across large 40-50 game benchmarks, a minimum of inside a couple of % points.


The Core i5-13500 will garner well to previous generation CPUs once exploitation DDR4 memory, providing 7% bigger performance than the Ryzen 5600X, which we estimate would create around 12% faster than the 12400.

 

additionally here are the 1440p results for those of you interested, additionally exploiting the RTX 4090.


The Ryzen 7600 was 9% faster than the 13500 using DDR5 memory, or 16% st once limiting the i5 to DDR4. exploitation DDR5 the 13500 was also 5% faster than the 12600K, however 7% slower than the 13600K.


Power Consumption


once it involves power consumption for an Associate in Nursing all-core workload, the Core i5-13500 is comparatively energy-efficient, pushing usual machine utilization to 231 watts with the usage of DDR4 and 266 watts with DDR5.


That's comparable power usage to the Ryzen 7700X for similar performance, the i5-13500 was simply 5% slower during this test.


Having aforesaid that, the 7700X isn't precisely an Associate in Nursing economical product, the non-X version delivered an equivalent level of performance primarily whereas exploitation significantly less power. Still, during this example, the 13500 matched the 7700 once using DDR4 memory and here we have a tendency to see that power usage for the complete system is simply 9% higher, therefore not too bad.


value vs. Performance


Running a value per frame analysis, for the 13500 we've got 2 prices, one with the $115 G.Skill DDR4-3600 CL16 package and the other with the use of the DDR5-6400 package. The DDR5 configuration is predicated on a $160 Z690 board, while the DDR4 configuration is predicated on an honest $130 B660 board.


The Zen four processors are priced with the DDR5-6000 CL30 memory they were tested with beside a $180 B650 board. we all know there's one G B650 board commercialism for $160, however, most are around $180 and up as this will increase your choices to 3 B650 boards.


supported those costs the Ryzen 7600 comes intent on a value of $2.53 per frame and technically with a bit of overclocking you'll be able to match the 7600X which might cut back the value per frame of the non-X half to $2.43, however, we have a tendency to not together with that knowledge here as were that specialize in out of the box performance.


once it involves gambling performance the Core i5-13500 could be very little dissatisfactory in terms of value, with the DDR4 version coming back in at a value of $2.71 per frame or $2. 77 for the DDR5 configuration, creating it 9% additional pricey per frame in comparison to the 7600.


notwithstanding we ignore the performance data, the value of the 13500 on a DDR5 motherboard is up to that of the 7600, whereas choosing DDR4 can prevent a mere $65, and {can} while not question leads to less gambling performance.


What we have a tendency to learn

The Core i5-13500 might be a totally captivating offering and definitely the only of the secured 13th-gen CPUs we have got examined so far. With its eight E-cores, this can be a genuinely robust productivity CPU, power consumption is incredibly affordable and thermals are simple to stay in restraint with an honest cooler. gambling performance is additionally solid, tho' it must go DDR5 to vie with the likes of the Ryzen five seven600.


once it involves productivity it can edge out the Ryzen 7 7700X, tho' looking at the work it's 's not invariably a good deal quicker than the 7600X like what we saw in our code compilation benchmark, and it can find yourself slower for gently rib applications reminiscent of Photoshop. Overall though, the 13500 is the superior productivity CPU.

gambling could be a ton less clear cut and we assume things swing the opposite approach with the 7600 being the superior selection here, even once resolving in value. The Ryzen 7600 can even be simply overclocked to provide 7600X levels of gaming performance, and whereas that doesn't amend things drastically, it will add an advantage to the Ryzen processor.

Sadly, Intel has fully secured down BCLK overclocking for 13th-gen Non-K processors, so notwithstanding you've got a motherboard sporting an external clock generator, it won't be able to do something with the 13500, that very sucks and could be a huge blow to the present half for enthusiasts.

The Intel box cooler also sucks, it's loud and sees the i5-13500 suffer thermal strangling problems in well beneath a second whereas the shadow concealment that comes with the Ryzen 7600 avoids any throttling and is additionally comparatively quiet. you'll be able to also achieve the performance shown during this review with the AMD box cooler, however, that's not invariably potential with the Intel cooler.


however, in our opinion, the biggest blow to the Core i5-13500 is the LGA 1700 platform, which is currently at the tip of the road with no future prospects.

Meanwhile, AM5 is going to be supported for years to come back and can support future hardware generations. Zen five is predicted to be a radical update, therefore having the flexibility to support future processors could be a large win, and it's why we'd get the Ryzen 7600 over the i5-13500.


Had the Intel hardware offered additional value for gamers, then it'd create the selection loads harder, however, the very fact that you just would like DDR5 memory to vie with the 7600, and DDR4 doesn't facilitate abundant with the worth equation anyway unless you decide for a 16GB kit, but we expect at now new system builders can need to take a position in an exceedingly 32GB kit. you'll be able to additionally purchase 16GB DDR5-4800 CL38 kits for around $80 and whereas that may be around double the value of a comparable DDR4 kit, a $40 saving is peanuts once you issue in the value of the motherboard and CPU.

For productivity we have a tendency to may see us finance within the Core i5-13500, tho' we've ought to admit for simply $80 additional the Ryzen seven 7700 would tempt us, as performance overall is comparable and you get that upgrade path. however we could just keep going, the non-K 13700 may be had for $410 or the Ryzen nine 7900 for $430, and at that time we're talking a few terribly completely different budgets.
https://sellshop.com.bd/intel-core-i5-13500-latest-review/